AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Slate digital vmr pro tools not working12/27/2022 Another is that it was created through extensive measurement and analysis of specific hit‑making consoles. Slate Digital's Virtual Console Collection is available in all major native formats, and is worthy of special attention for a number of reasons, one being that its development was led by Fabrice Gabriel, the man behind Slate's remarkable FG‑X mastering processor and Eiosis's superb E2 De‑esser and Transienter. Sumthing SpecialĪll of which brings us to the product under review here, and the latest candidate for supplying 'glue' to DAW‑based mixes. And, like many modern plug‑ins, it's too demanding of system resources to use on every track in a large mix in any case. I don't find it makes mixes come together more easily, nor does it particularly help to 'glue' them together once mixed. It sounds great on bass and electric guitars, and occasionally I'll put it over the mix bus, but to me, its usefulness lies in the effect it has on individual sources. ![]() Take Universal Audio's Studer A800 tape emulation, for example. I've tried quite a few, but to my ears, even the best of them are often closer to special effects than to something I'd want to use on every track in every mix. Tape and tube emulations, mix bus compressors, non‑specific analogue warmth generators. All too often, such plug‑ins simply compromise rather than complement the good qualities of a digital mix, such as clarity, separation and accurate representation of transients. And on the sonic side of things, I've rarely been convinced by plug‑ins designed to reproduce the mysterious 'glue' that many people claim is missing from digital mixing environments. The precision of drawing in automation with the mouse wins every time over the limited amounts of real‑time control that you get from eight cheap faders and a few knobs. On the ergonomic front, for instance, I've never enjoyed using small assignable fader surfaces. The latter has been expanded here to show the grouping controls.Īs a home‑studio owner who works digitally and 'in the box', I've always been a little bit sceptical about products that are supposed to make mixing on a computer more like mixing in the analogue domain. The Virtual Console Collection comprises two plug‑ins: Virtual Channel (left) and Virtual Mix Buss (right). This method seems to work very well with these plugins in particular.Can the failings of mixing in software really be solved by buying more software? That's the claim Slate Digital are making for their Virtual Console Collection. I should mention that personally I am very subtly with all of these effects - little and often is a thought crossing my mind constantly. It's like I can tell it has been slammed but the dynamics are still there - weird experience to listen to. I've had a good play and it is really incredible, but it does seem to have a very particular sound to it on live orchestral mixes and I'm not sure I am a fan. Parallel comp might help with this!ĭoes anyone have any experience of using the FG-X on orchestral stuff. I'm currently mixing a particularly dynamic live orchestral track with that plugin on all of the group channels, but it still sounds pretty slammed even just ticking over at (max) -2dB of compression. ![]() Good shout using the FG-MU (Fairchild emulator for those who aren't familiar with Slate stuff) in parallel. I tend to add the VTM and VCC to almost everything as it does make everything sound warmer and wider when used subtly on every track, but what are your thoughts on this? Presumably most of the big sample library developers are also going through really nice mixing desks and pre-amps, so again, is it worth adding these again? I have tried it and there is of course a change in the sound, but I can't really work out if it's "better" or not. I'll give you an example - Spitfire Audio already record to tape, so it makes sense to me to leave the VTM off of these. I'm interest to hear how people use these differently for sample libraries vs the real thing. The VCC and VTM seem to be staples in a lot of people's workflows - as they are in mine too!
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |